Assessment and Rehabilitation Services
Psychological Services
Physio Clinics
Workplace Assessments and Rehabilitation
Strategy and Assessment
Psychological and Counselling Services
Training and Education Workshops
Wellbeing Annual Report
Home
Workload is usually top of the list when organisations check on the psychosocial risks and hazards their people face.
Responses from more than 17,000 working New Zealanders in our [link:] Workplace Wellbeing Assessment show that workload is the most common work stressor – over and above poor manager support, lack of change consultation or autonomy. WorkSafe’s 2021 Psychosocial Survey tells a similar story, with workload demands coming in as the most common psychosocial risk across the Kiwi workforce.
The story starts to differ, though, when we consider what it is about the workload that creates the potential for harm. Then, we can pinpoint the right solution to eliminate, mitigate and continually monitor the risk.
WorkSafe’s Psychosocial Survey highlights three types of work demands: work pace, demands for hiding emotions, and quantitative demands. There are also cognitive demands mentioned in research on workload-related risk, and “hindrance demands”, such as trying to cope with role conflict or toxic workplace politics, which get in the way of good work getting done and poorer health and wellbeing.
Of course, according to research, not all work demands are bad for wellbeing and performance. “Challenge demands” like high workload, tight deadlines or work that requires a lot of mental effort and concentration can be stimulating enough to motivate us to grow and feel accomplished. Although those benefits decrease if these demands are excessive or prolonged.
Let’s consider four different scenarios. At face value, all might look as though “workload” is the problem.
Sarah is a legal assistant who is switched on from the minute she clocks on to the minute she clocks off. Whether it’s urgently printing and running documents to court, making rushed phone calls to clients, or typing up reports that are needed ASAP, she is forced to work at a breakneck pace without any real pause to eat or take a breather.
Work pace is the key psychosocial risk that Sarah is exposed to. If this pace keeps up all day, every day, Sarah is at high risk of harm. This is true even if Sarah can get done everything that she needs to and clocks off promptly at 5pm daily.
Johan is managing a team of field technicians through a large organisational restructure. Unfortunately, a quarter of his team is being made redundant. Johan spends most of his days in phone calls and meetings with upset people, some of whom are prone to lashing out verbally and casting blame towards him. Johan must work very hard to remain neutral and not respond negatively to these outbursts. Because he cares about his team, he also carries a lot of emotional weight from having to let them go.
The weight of emotional demand is the key psychosocial risk that Johan is exposed to. If this restructure drags out, and he doesn’t get the support he needs, Johan is at risk of harm. This is true even if Johan’s days aren’t particularly fast-paced and he can get everything done that he needs to.
Henry is a nurse at the local hospital. He gets everything done in his shift that he needs to but he lives in fear that he’s missed something important because he is holding so much in his head. At any given point in his shift, he has a long list of patients in his care, all of whom have different complex needs. He’s always caught between competing demands and having to make important decisions without all the information.
The overload of cognitive demand is the key psychosocial risk that Henry is exposed to. While the speed he works at is quite high, Henry thrives in a fast-paced environment, and he is good at taking breaks. The real problem is that his mind is overloaded, making him more prone to mistakes, and less able to switch off when his shift is over. In small doses this is OK, and even energising, but it is not sustainable long-term.
Callie works in a customer care team. Callie’s team was told by their manager that their backlog of unresolved customer enquiries is far too high. Callie’s team is asked to “do what they can” to reduce the backlog, leading to mounting pressure to work through breaks, start early and stay late. This has been going on for weeks now and Callie is starting to notice the strain.
The level of quantitative demand (workload) is the key psychosocial risk that Callie is exposed to. It is not possible for Callie to complete all expected work tasks without working longer hours or getting behind on other duties. This is because there is too much work to be done in the day.
Now that we’ve understood what it is about people’s work that has the potential to cause harm (we can help you explore this through a [update link] Psychosocial Risk Assessment), we can design better solutions to help.
Let’s look at one last scenario to see how, with the right support and resources in place, even a high-stress situation can be managed effectively, minimising the risk of harm.
Kieran is a project manager handling multiple high-stakes projects, which often means high workload, fast pace and tight deadlines to making decisions. However, Kieran’s workplace has implemented structured workflows, regular check-ins with his supervisor to share the cognitive load, and a well-resourced team to support him to meet deadlines. Kieran manages the pace of his work by balancing his efforts with good breaks during busy work periods after learning this key skill from a [link update:] mental health workshop. Despite the inherent psychosocial hazards, the effective support and resources his organisation has in place help Kieran manage his tasks and wellbeing without feeling overwhelmed.
The key takeaway here is that you don’t know what will help workers until you really understand the work conditions, and the people who are experiencing them.
We can help. Using our 12 Factor Framework (aligned with ISO-45003) in our [link update]: Psychosocial Risk Assessment, we help you identify the key risks in your organisation that may cause harm to your people’s mental health and wellbeing.